Elizabeth Taylor

News…
Elizabeth Taylor died on 23 March. According to her Times obituary she was ‘married eight times to seven different husbands’.

… which makes me think …

Who were these lucky men? The answer seems to have been:

1 Nicky Hilton Jnr (heir to the hotel chain) – divorced
2 Michael Wilding (British actor) – divorced
3 Mike Todd (film producer) – widowed when Todd died in a plane crash
4 Eddie Fisher (‘crooner’) – divorced
5 Richard Burton – divorced (they were married 1964-1974)
6 Richard Burton – divorced (they were married 1975-1976)
7 John Warner (American Senator) – divorced
8 Larry Fortensky (toy boy) – divorced in 1996.

… and so …

I reckon this was seven divorces in a 44 year period. She seems to have liked getting married more than she liked being married. Not sure this makes her a good advertisement for marriage but she certainly would have been a divorce lawyer’s dream client!

My first divorce client was on her fifth divorce from only her third husband … and I have seen the likes of her since.

The Exciting New Rules are Coming

News…

This evening I attended a course at St John’s Chambers Bristol on the new Family Proceedings Rules which come into force on 6 April.

… which makes me think …

What an impossibly dry subject for a lecture. Good effort on the part of Lucy Reed (Pink Tape blogger) and Catriona Duthie.

… and so …

Tomorrow and Monday I shall be ‘on holiday’ reading the new Rules, updating the firm’s website and working out what changes we need to make to systems, handouts and the like. I shall also be thinking about cases where having a good grasp of the new Rules can be exploited to the benefit of our clients

If the arrival of a new set of Rules does not excite you, then you are not meant to be a lawyer. I am excited at the prospect of reading and getting on top of all those new Rules and Practice Directions – hundreds of pages of them! How sad you might think, but I am really looking forward to it.

Mediation … Croyde …

News…

Last week’s news depends on where you were at the time. If I had been behind my desk the news would have been that most couples looking to use the family law courts in future will be required to consider mediation. As it was, I was in north Devon where the news was I went for some good walks with my family and some good runs by myself and I drank some good beer.

… which makes me think …

Mediation is a good process for many c0uples but not all.

North Devon is a great place for a holiday in February but not if your thing is ski-ing or winter sun.

… and so …

It’s horses for courses.

Give most issues the perspective of a week and they look a bit different and are less of an issue.

Divorce abolished?

News…
The New Rules refer to a ‘Matrimonial Order’ and not to a divorce.

… which makes me think …
Dolly Parton would never have a had a hit with M-A-T-R-I-M-O-N-I-A-L-O-R-D-E-R.

… and so …
I am sure we will carry on calling it a divorce.

The Rules are changing – Aaagh!

News…
On 6 April the family law Rules are changing. The Family Proceedings Rules 1991 are being replaced with the Family Procedure Rules 2010.

… which makes me think …
this is BIG NEWS – if only to family lawyers. Just as it would be if we now had to drive on the other side of the road or they allowed rugby players to pass the ball forwards. Some of us are going to have to unlearn some of the habits of a lifetime.

Legislation is one thing, but to a lawyer the real meat and substance of the law is to be found in the Rules. No half measures this time; in addition to the new Rules we are being treated to a new set of Practice Directions which amplify and give guidance on the Rules.

The law is long, the Rules are longer and the Practice Directions are longer still.

… and so …
if you think your family lawyer is looking a bit weary over the next few weeks, it will be because he has been up half the night reading the new Rules and Practice Directions, updating his precedents, editing his website, re-writing the handouts. I am going on (one more) course next month and am then booking two days’ ‘holiday’ to do all of this. Aaagh!

Wedding reception at KFC

News …
A Bristol couple are getting married in the Register Office here today and are then holding their wedding reception at KFC.

… which makes me think …
Many couples separate in the first year of marriage and go on to divorce. I dealt with a such case recently where the husband had taken a loan of £18,000 to pay for their wedding. Needless to say, this debt was a complicating factor when it came to dividing their meagre assets.

… and so …
Well done the KFC couple for not biting off more than they can chew (as it were)! I hope my three daughters read this; anyone for Burger King?

More rights for unmarried couples?

Sir Nicholas Wall, the country’s most senior family law Judge, gave an interview to The Times last week in which he said ‘I am in favour of cohabitees having rights because of the injustice of the present system’.

The present system does produce results which seem unjust; by which I mean they seem unjust to me as an individual. Divorce law has as its ‘over-riding objective’ the reaching of just solutions, but there is at the moment no separate category of law to which cohabiting couples can turn for an answer, let alone for a just answer. They have to rely on their rights under property law and under the law of trusts and these types of law do not have as their central purpose to deliver socially just outcomes.

So from top to bottom in the legal system we can agree that the present system does not provide justice for many, typically for the long-standing ‘common law wife’ who has given ‘the best years of her life’ to a relationship but has allowed all the assets to remain in her partner’s name and who cannot point to clear evidence of a common intention to share those assets.

But how to change the system? It will require the Government to legislate. Then the questions start. How much of a priority should it be to bring forward what would inevitably be complex and controversial legislation; are there not bigger priorities? How do we define cohabitees, given our capacity for making an endless variety of domestic arrangements? What rights should a former parner have? If those rights should be less than the rights a spouse might have, how much less?

Most family lawyers could rapidly rattle off 20 such questions, or even 50 or more. The system we have got is the one we have got. It is easy to criticise many of our systems but it is often very difficult to think up something better to put in its place.

Reforming this area of family law is something that previous Governments have shied away from, or have paid lip service to. When you get down to the nitty gritty, it is a very,very difficult thing to do. I doubt if anything is going to change for some time and, until it does, we will simply have to make the best of the system that we do have.

Two million of us cohabit and one child in four is born to unmarried parents. My advice to long-term cohabitees is think about having a formal Cohabitation Agreement prepared (this can achieve the clarity and justice you and your partner want for yourselves), or think about getting married (some of us are big fans of being married!) or at least make sure you are sharing your life with someone who truly shares your vision of the future.

Marry abroad – divorce at home

An article in today’s Times reports that one in five marriages last year took place abroad. The statistics are that 57,000 couples went abroad to tie the knot which is an increase of a third since 2005.

That’s a lot more than I would have guessed.

England still remains the ‘divorce capital’ of the world. Where a wife has the option of bringing her divorce proceedings here or abroad, it is still generally considered likely to be in her best interests to get divorced here where settlements tend to be more generous to wives.

If you do get married abroad I would strongly advise you to take particularly good care of your original Marriage Certificate. The Authorities, here including the divorce court, often insist on seeing the original certificate (or an official duplicate) rather than a photocopy. In my experience it usually proves no simple matter trying to obtain an official duplicate of a foreign Marriage Certificate. The Dominican Republic seem to make it virtually impossible.

Over the counter paternity tests from Boots

It would be interesting to know what market research lies behind Boots’ decision to market home paternity testing kits. ‘Excuse me, Sir, do you have the time to answer a few quick questions for me? … Are you sure you’re the father of all your wife’s children, Sir? ,,, How sure is that, Sir,on a scale of 1 to 10? .. Would you like to know - a lot OR quite a lot OR certainly not ?

Over the years I have acted for several ‘fathers’ who were living with the possibility that they were not the biological father of their child. some were clearly tormented by it but others had concluded that there was more to be lost than to be gained by taking steps to discover the cold biological  truth.

I do not imagine paternity testing kits will be flying off the shelves in Boots. A Dad Kit would surely be a far more embarrassing puchase to have in your shopping basket than a packet of contraceptives.

My advice to anyone, be they father, mother or adult child, who feels they need to go in search of an answer to the question that will not go away, would be to talk it through first with some wise heads; your GP, Solicitor or a counsellor. It is a vey big decision indeed and we all sometimes need help to make good ones.

Other people see angles we cannot see for ourselves. I have recently had to consider the question of whether a ‘father’, who paid maintenance for years for children he thought were his, had a claim to recover his maintenance payments when it turned out he was not their biological father. The answer, as so often, is: it depends.

New Year’s Resolution 2011

By now (the end of January)  many New Year Resolutions will have been broken and forgotten all about.

My New Year Resolution was to write a regular blog. I haven’t written a single one. So it could be said I have broken my resolution whereas in fact I prefer to think I just haven’t got round to getting started yet.